4 ms·
seriously? it took me 1 second to google and confirm its truth. or is 1995 too long ago for kids these days? also, refuting one argument does not shoot down un
by y4mi 9y ago
seriously? it took me 1 second to google and confirm its truth. or is 1995 too long ago for kids these days?
also, refuting one argument does not shoot down unrelated arguments.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_referendum,_1995 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_referendum,_1995
- CoolGuySteve 9y agoThey did not vote to succeed and there was only one referendum.
- y4mi 9y agoI understood the GP argument as "having voted on the issue", not "having voted to leave". The former implies that a significant portion of the population want independence. and i'm not sure i understand you correctly, but the very first sentence in the wikipedia link says that the 1995 referendum was the second one... this [1] was the first. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_referendum,_1980 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_referendum,_1980