Odd thing to say, the closest the article gets to this supposed BBC agenda is: > "The possibility that some of those in the graves were Muslim cannot be comple

Odd thing to say, the closest the article gets to this supposed BBC agenda is: > "The possibility that some of those in the graves were Muslim cannot be completely ruled out," Then they say it's more likely it was some much more limited cultural influence. Then they talk about trade, in the context of the wide dispersion of Muslim coins. Then they say that the inscription isn't right, so probably it was an incorrect copy by whoever produced the fabric. The article is entirely reasonable, if it is a matter of ideology clouding judgment perhaps you should look at yourself rather than the BBC.