3 ms·
Why 10 years ago? I wrote this in 2014: http://markos.gaivo.net/articles/chirp-squawk-cackle-or-honk.html http://markos.gaivo.net/articles/chirp-squawk-cackle-
by samastur 9y ago
Why 10 years ago?
I wrote this in 2014: http://markos.gaivo.net/articles/chirp-squawk-cackle-or-honk.html http://markos.gaivo.net/articles/chirp-squawk-cackle-or-honk...
However I effectively stopped using Twitter in 2011 for these same reasons and have been arguing about dangers of Twitter, FB and ilk even before then. Regretfully in places not well archived.
Not that it matters because my reach is practically non-existent. I was also far from being original or pioneering.
- peoplewindow 9y agoGood response! I read your article. I agree with everything in it, but I don't think it argues that Twitter is a threat to democracy. The word democracy does not appear anywhere in it, for example. You argued that Twitter is vacuous, empty, filled with half or quarter baked ideas and that the brevity of messages leads to anti-intellectual arguments. That it's a notch above monkey speak. And you speculated that this may have some sort of impact on society, possibly, or maybe it was just useless and a missed opportunity. I actually never used Twitter and actively avoid it, for all the reasons you give. Still, I wouldn't argue it's a threat to democracy. The sort of people who get into empty headed Twitter fights weren't going to write rational, well thought out essays if Twitter didn't exist. They'd just not write at all.