They're objecting to the idea that there is no reason, never, for anyone good-looking to commit to anyone. See again the original sentence: "top percentage [ge

They're objecting to the idea that there is no reason, never, for anyone good-looking to commit to anyone. See again the original sentence: "top percentage [get] frequent sex with no reason to commit". That sentence is simply too strong to be true. Nobody is denying that the possibility of easily finding someone for casual may cause some people to hesitate before entering committed relationships. But as it is written, it denies the existence of reasons for commitment other than to secure frequent sex. There must be at least some people who, despite their excellent looks, top IQ, huge penis, and high political office still found a reason to commit to a partner. The previous US president comes to mind...