4 ms·

But such a form of minimalism won't work unless other people are non-minimalists. For example, if you find you need a trilobed screwdriver to repair one of you

But such a form of minimalism won't work unless other people are non-minimalists. For example, if you find you need a trilobed screwdriver to repair one of your few possessions you'll either have to borrow it from a friend or rent it[0]. Both those options require that someone else be non-minimalist for your benefit. If all people were strongly minimalist this would have the effect of moving nearly all gadgets into the service domain. Screwdriver-as-service, ironing-as-a-service, yard-brushing-as-a-service. Is that scenario really less consumerist and less stressful than just going out and buying a screwdriver and keeping it in a box in the garage? [0] or buy it and then sell it when done, which i'll categorise as renting here

warent 9y ago
That's an interesting argument I hadn't heard before. It's a good point. Is it less consumerist? Probably, because you're paying for only precisely what you need, and the odds of getting something you don't need (and never will use) are far lower. Alternative idea, if everyone were minimalist then we could develop a system of communal tools and goods.
dagw 9y ago
if you find you need a trilobed screwdriver to repair one of your few possessions Pay someone to come and fix it or just throw it out and get a new one. Being Minimalist doesn't have to mean being frugal.
- AstralStorm 9y ago
  Then the only difference is that you do not keep things you do not use. However it is a misnomer until you minimalize number of possessions to which implies frugality to a point. Not perhaps in the "buy cheapest" but "buy least".
tedmiston 9y ago
This is easily solved by tool libraries or tool rental services or borrowing from a neighbor that builds stuff. Another solution is buying one, possibly used, and reselling it after you're done. Most minimalists heavily encourage borrowing or renting things that aren't in your personal definition of minimal (but might be in the next person's). Because each person defines their minimal set of possessions differently, I don't follow to your conclusion that minimalism is dependent upon non-minimalists.

warent 9y ago

That's an interesting argument I hadn't heard before. It's a good point. Is it less consumerist? Probably, because you're paying for only precisely what you need, and the odds of getting something you don't need (and never will use) are far lower. Alternative idea, if everyone were minimalist then we could develop a system of communal tools and goods.

dagw 9y ago

if you find you need a trilobed screwdriver to repair one of your few possessions Pay someone to come and fix it or just throw it out and get a new one. Being Minimalist doesn't have to mean being frugal.

AstralStorm 9y ago
Then the only difference is that you do not keep things you do not use. However it is a misnomer until you minimalize number of possessions to which implies frugality to a point. Not perhaps in the "buy cheapest" but "buy least".

tedmiston 9y ago

This is easily solved by tool libraries or tool rental services or borrowing from a neighbor that builds stuff. Another solution is buying one, possibly used, and reselling it after you're done. Most minimalists heavily encourage borrowing or renting things that aren't in your personal definition of minimal (but might be in the next person's). Because each person defines their minimal set of possessions differently, I don't follow to your conclusion that minimalism is dependent upon non-minimalists.