3 ms·
I think the problem is drift over time. Maybe you would have used an item, or did use it, but your life has changed--as lives inevitably do--and now you wouldn'
by ellius 9y ago
I think the problem is drift over time. Maybe you would have used an item, or did use it, but your life has changed--as lives inevitably do--and now you wouldn't use that item under any circumstances. But the thing has become part of your environment, you're used to it, and there's the possibility that the part of your life which motivated you to buy the thing in the first place might come back. So through inertia you acquire more and more stuff, and it starts to quietly sap your energy as you begin to associate subconscious feelings of guilt and frustration with it.
In my book, "minimalism" is often a treatment for the symptom rather than the disease. The real cure is to actively remove items that have a negative emotional connotation, and to hold onto only those things that you either use or otherwise affiliate positive feelings with. (For example, I almost never use my flashlight, but it feels good to know I have it on hand in case the power dies out. That's worth keeping.)
- tedmiston 9y ago> The real cure is to actively remove items that have a negative emotional connotation, and to hold onto only those things that you either use or otherwise affiliate positive feelings with. Is this basically the same idea as "spark joy" from Marie Kondo's books? http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/why-keeping-only-the-clothes-that-spark-joy-is-magical-216094 http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/why-keeping-only-the-clothes... https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/23/garden/home-organization-advice-from-marie-kondo.html https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/23/garden/home-organization-...
- ellius 9y agoI took it from "10 Minute Declutter," but it seems like the same idea. It's the only principle I used when cleaning up my own spaces and I'm amazed at the difference just a few months made. My whole state of mind is better.