5 ms·
Your post seems to demonstrate _exactly_ what the post you're replying to is saying: most of the speed has to do with I/O strategy (buffering and syscall usage)
by benaiah 9y ago
Your post seems to demonstrate _exactly_ what the post you're replying to is saying: most of the speed has to do with I/O strategy (buffering and syscall usage), not the actual speed of the involved language. Maybe I'm missing a distinction you're making, but I'm not following how your previous comment leads to what you're saying here.
- glandium 9y agoThe rust version that does exactly what python does (buffered output) is an order of magnitude faster (even if I force the rust buffer size to be 4KiB like with python2).
- kibwen 9y agoTo head off this comment chain, I've softened the language in my original comment to "overwhelmed by" rather than implying that non-I/O factors are wholly irrelevant. :)