people regularly violate traffic laws when they decide it isn't risky People doing so take on the responsibility for their actions and can take situational ass

people regularly violate traffic laws when they decide it isn't risky People doing so take on the responsibility for their actions and can take situational assessment of risk to drivers, pedestrians, cyclists, etc. They also accept the risk of a traffic stop, citation, summons, search, fine, and effects on insurance rates. What can a traffic officer even do to an algorithm or its company? There isn't even statute law (in CA, anyway) empowering them to hold the "driver" accountable on any level. When you program an algorithm to disregard law in non-emergency situations, there are so many edge conditions that come into play that go untested in advance. I'm afraid these issues will go ignored until there is a body count to throw into the media narrative.