3 ms·
Mmmh so far, it doesn't look much more compelling than good old genetic algorithms...
by d--b 9y ago
Mmmh so far, it doesn't look much more compelling than good old genetic algorithms...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- gcb0 9y agoWelcome to the Fad Career! :D Previously relegated to Online Software Engineers, now Data Scientists can feel what it is like to have tons of recent undergrads flooding their fields and coming up with all sorts of "new" ideas that are just the first version of something that is established in the field for decades! Next up, Electrical and Firmware Engineers flooding the IoT Fad Career! Just give it some 5 or 6 years.
- pizza 9y agoMake sure to also look out for epigenetic neuro- noo- quantum cyber- negentropic etc. in the coming years
- noobermin 9y agoThat this isn't higher voted up upsets me. Instead, we see a bunch of circle jerking in the top comments. Somewhat disappointed in HN on this.
- doomjunky 9y agoGenetic algorithms are too slow.
- d--b 9y agoGenetic algorithms didn't have millions of core available for training. It's a different optimization of the same problem.