4 ms·
Today I have already consumed more sugar than most of my distant ancestors would see in a year. The device i hold in my pocket reminds me that it is time to pe
by MarkPNeyer 9y ago
Today I have already consumed more sugar than most of my distant ancestors would see in a year. The device i hold in my pocket reminds me that it is time to perform the action, and so i will perform the action. I sit down about 10 hours a day, and I have never once hunted for an animal I would eat, nor retried food from nature to consume, aside from a few raspberries on the hill in my parents' back yard when I was a child.
The contours of my life are dictated largely by a curious system called 'capitalism', a distributed computational mechanism whereby largernumbers of agents act with only one goal: to maximize their own utilities. I think capitalism is a mostly benevolent AI attempting to limit the oppressive conditions of our reailty's scarcity, and to allow billions of us to live on a planet that can only support so many hunter-gatherers per square meter. Many suspect it is not benevolent.
The singularity is already upon us; it's unevenly distributed. It started with the sedentary shift. Agricultural societies dropped the egalitarian nature of their ancestors, they had lower average health, and they had a tiny elite cast of nobles presiding over a much larger population of what were essentially slaves. As hunter-gatherer population increased, fighting was more frequent. An army of slaves beats a smaller contingent of well-fed free men. This terrible knowledge was the apple in the garden. What we call our written history is essentially the singularity playing itself out, as knowledge accumulates, depends, reflects itself, and expands.
Our lives are already controlled by this embodied, accumulated knowledge. Capitalism, rule by the head, our tools are knowledge condensed into matter, and we are controlled by them, living lives as far from our natural environments as cows in a farm or chickens in tiny cages, towering over the streets of hong kong.
I don't think it's destroying us, any more than we seek to destroy chickens or cows. Well, sometimes we do. I had a veggie burger for lunch today though.
- ghostbrainalpha 9y agoI love this comment. Sorry I'm not contributing anything substantive, but I wanted you to know someone noticed this, and it was brilliant.
- MarkPNeyer 9y agoThank you! If you enjoyed the comment, you might like my book on amazon. It's free if you have kindle unlimited. https://www.amazon.com/Mechanics-Emotion-Structure-Possibility-ebook/dp/B01MDPLI4S/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1507919723&sr=8-1&keywords=mechanics+of+emotion https://www.amazon.com/Mechanics-Emotion-Structure-Possibili...
- photojosh 9y ago> I have never once hunted for an animal I would eat I ate a lizard we caught in the Australian outback once. I'd never thought of it as being the only time I ever performed this task, but there you have it.
- TeMPOraL 9y agoI think along very similar lines, except I don't believe capitalism (or generally, the market) is a benevolent AI. I believe it's an Unfriendly AI, in the Yudkowsky/Bostrom sense. That is, it's a strong optimization system that does not care about individuals and societies the way individual humans care. It just does what it does. So far we've enjoyed the power of capitalism because its incentives were mostly aligned with ours. Our technological civilization is a direct result of that! However, I think those incentives are increasingly becoming misaligned, and that it's the source of many of current woes. In fact, capitalism is slowly becoming more dangerous than it is helpful.