3 ms·
He's probably referring to the problem that is presented in the paper: nobody uses standard notations because there's no such thing! :) Edit: For example, how
by v-yadli 9y ago
He's probably referring to the problem that is presented in the paper: nobody uses standard notations because there's no such thing! :)
Edit:
For example, how do you say 'one layer'? W_i? L_i?
- deepnotderp 9y agoYup! And half the papers mean W_i to mean the weights for the layer. And then there are those who say screw mathematics completely and use the Hadamard or Kronecker product symbol to denote convolution, which has caused me no end of trouble in the past.
- macawfish 9y agoAhh, I get it now!