5 ms·
Wikipedia with better readability
- 0x4f3759df 9y agoFont seems too big. Information density is low per viewport
- bichiliad 9y agoYou may want to add some spacing between the body text and the right sidebar. Right now, they run right up against each other.
- mici 9y agoThere is no spacing between the info box and the main text, this decreases readability for me.
- diimdeep 9y agoTitle is a lie. Just like the cake was a lie.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- lowmagnet 9y agoImages are un-clickable, unfortunately.
- type0 9y agoThis: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/
- slowmovintarget 9y ago* -5: Bad (or no) use of white space * -60: Serif font on screen * -40: Sharp, plain, distracting boxes instead of whitespace * -80: Huge margins on a desktop site * -8816: Loaded with Javascript Yes, that's under -9000!
- majewsky 9y ago> Serif font on screen Serif fonts work very nicely with sufficiently high DPI, or if they are designed to withstand low DPI like e.g. Georgia. Is there any way for a website to know if it's running on a high-DPI screen?
- DanBC 9y agoI use two windows. I split my screen vertically. It would be nice if content reflowed to fit my borders, with a bit of whitespace. Here's a screenshot. https://imgur.com/a/I0hnF https://imgur.com/a/I0hnF The more readable wikipedia requires horizontal scrolling. (But also note YouTube includes too much whitespace, making the video small. This is a recent, annoying, change that I haven't created a tampermonkey rule for yet.)
- lousken 9y agowhite page with js off => zero readability