> I still chuckle when randos make arguments like "C++ can't be parsed with an LALR parser" I'm not an expert on parsers but I don't think LALR parser can eval

> I still chuckle when randos make arguments like "C++ can't be parsed with an LALR parser" I'm not an expert on parsers but I don't think LALR parser can evaluate constexpr C++ functions which is required for parsing C++. E.g. in the following code, expression `A<f()>::a * u` will parse either as a variable declaration (int* u) or a multiplication (5 * 5) depending on the value returned by constexpr function f: template<bool b> class A {}; template<> struct A<true> { typedef int a; }; template<> struct A<false> { static const int a = 5; }; constexpr bool f() { return true; } const int u = 5; int main() { A<f()>::a * u; }