4 ms·
Yes but not in this case. It says it's made up at the bottom of the interview.
by alinajaf 16y ago
Yes but not in this case. It says it's made up at the bottom of the interview.
- mfukar 16y agoI know. I read it.
- senki 16y agoYou are right. This text is from 1998. An another decade passed and still no one gets the joke...
- hga 16y agoHeh, but it's not entirely made up. Mentor Graphics really did epically fail when they tried that rewrite and it was a major event in C++ history, seeing as how they had (informal?) support from Bell Labs etc. etc. This very useful book covers it a bit in the intro: http://www.amazon.com/Taming-Pattern-Classes-Persistence-Projects/dp/0201528266 http://www.amazon.com/Taming-Pattern-Classes-Persistence-Pro... The number one lesson learned from that experience according to the author and my memory was "Make your class hierarchies directed acyclic graphs" ... which of course wasn't a C++ issue at all. As the first widely adopted OO language C++ gets a lot of mostly undeserved flack for being the medium in which a lot of us learned the OO paradigm. A bit like how all those companies that oversold expert systems in the '80s blamed Lisp for their problems, causing both AI and Lisp winters.