3 ms·
On the other hand, consider the Arnolfini marriage portrait (that's this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Eyck_-_Arnolfini_Portrait.jpg https://en.wi
by HarryHirsch 9y ago
On the other hand, consider the Arnolfini marriage portrait (that's this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Eyck_-_Arnolfini_Portrait.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Van_Eyck_-_Arnolfini_Port...), and you recognize that clothes like the couple are wearing in the painting are affordable only to 1-percenters. Then and now.
- zeveb 9y ago> you recognize that clothes like the couple are wearing in the painting are affordable only to 1-percenters. Then and now. I'm pretty sure that someone in the SCA has made one of those outfits. In fact: https://i.pinimg.com/564x/1b/9a/4b/1b9a4b90019bef529ca2e4cd0fca46ea.jpg https://i.pinimg.com/564x/1b/9a/4b/1b9a4b90019bef529ca2e4cd0...
- HarryHirsch 9y agoGoogle makes it possible: http://www.naergilien.info/my-costumes/medieval-renaissance/the-arnolfini-dress/ http://www.naergilien.info/my-costumes/medieval-renaissance/... About two weeks of sewing (14 days) with approximately 7-10 hours per day (every day!); resulting in approximately 100 hours of work before the dress was finished.
- dom0 9y agoi.e. the labor costs alone are around 1500-3000 €.
- jxramos 9y agohaha, I love it, very get it done take charge initiative and spirit in this group I take it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Creative_Anachronism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_Creative_Anachroni...
- ComputerGuru 9y agoIs that Arabic on the wall?
- HarryHirsch 9y agoThat's Latin letters, a very very florid cursive hand and reads Iohannes de eyck fuit hic 1434 - Johann van Eyck was present 1434. Note the ancient shape of the digit 4! It settled into its familiar form only in the later half of the 15th century.
- B1FF_PSUVM 9y agoJust above a small mirror showing the backs of the couple and the painter at work ... (Take that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_wall https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_wall ...)
- ComputerGuru 9y agoOh, I see it now. I was on mobile and was getting a view of the image that either couldn't (too low res) or wouldn't (bad viewport) zoom, so this is what I saw: https://i.imgur.com/yxpLRTg.png https://i.imgur.com/yxpLRTg.png As you can see, at that zoom level the words look like parts of the letters and it is the shape of the text area itself that was reminiscent of Arabic characters. Of course, once zoomed in it's a different story: https://i.imgur.com/4oQ5R2F.jpg https://i.imgur.com/4oQ5R2F.jpg
- WalterBright 9y agoI'd still rather wear jeans.
- photojosh 9y agoI'd want my hiking pants if I lived back then. Jeans suck as soon as they get wet.
- jxramos 9y agoI don't see anything drastically ornate that would really bump up the labor costs like something you'd see in Elizabethan fashions. Can't be the dyes used which I understand used to be pricey but are now pretty trivial in our wide color palette. Are you thinking the fur would be the expensive part today or the fit to person tailoring? An interesting related question would be the rate tailors charged in the past vs today. I'd imagine more today since fashions have veered so dominantly to mass produced clothing that there's no demand for what what today would essentially be in the realm of costume making.
- HarryHirsch 9y agoThe sable fur for Giovanni's vest is expensive, of course, as is the silk cloth, and there is the fit and the tailoring, just look at the pleats. And for a really nice straw hat you can expect to pay several hundreds. The wife's outfit is three times as elaborate as his. There was a priest whom I used to know. His vestments were of exceptional taste and quality - it was his mother who made them; she knew how to sew and embroider, and where to get the proper brocade from. I never asked him about the amount of labour that went into this, but it must have been a lot.