4 ms·
Why irritated? It's one of two correct plural forms of "millenium." https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/millennium https://www.merriam-webster.com/dicti
by rojondo 9y ago
Why irritated? It's one of two correct plural forms of "millenium."
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/millennium https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/millennium
- dkarl 9y agoThat's literally[1] the worst argument ever. [1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/literally
- dkarl 9y agoAll right, to spell it out: Merriam-Webster is not a dictionary of "correct" forms. The usage of "literally" in my post is documented in Merriam-Webster as "used in an exaggerated way to emphasize a statement or description that is not literally true or possible." It would be inappropriate to use "literally" in that way in a science article in the New York Times, because the standards for writing in the New York Times are different from the standards for inclusion in the Merriam-Webster dictionary.