3 ms·

What standby? This article is about Zuckerberg apologizing (again) for being completely tone-deaf in a manner that suggests he really has no idea how humans wor

by 20170319 9y ago

What standby? This article is about Zuckerberg apologizing (again) for being completely tone-deaf in a manner that suggests he really has no idea how humans work beyond stimulus-response machines. What do you suggest? That we comment on the VR tech? This entire thread is just reaction on his behavior. You may as well just close the thread.

dang 9y ago
The "sociopath" standby, with extra anti-points for "dumb fucks" icing. The thread of course has plenty of things to talk about other than that petrified nugget, which was getting old ten years ago.
- 20170319 9y ago
  "dumb fucks" was an event in time. Sociopath is a quality that manifests repeatedly through different events over time, including this latest one. This entire thread is people saying the same thing in different words. Harvey Weinsten appearing in nothing but his boxer shorts for an actress audition was a moment in time. The qualities that made him creepy and predatory remained constant.
  - dang 9y ago
    You're doubling down on what I asked you not to do, which is casually sling accusations of mental illness with an internet swear word. If you do it again we will ban you. Even if you were right in this case (which you have no evidence for, just a connect-the-dots cartoon, and few dots at that), this would still be so. "Sociopath" comes even before "shill" on the feces-throwing internet trigger list. Every time we tolerate such a violation of the site guidelines encourages others to do the same. That slope is both slippery and steep. Since my #1 job is to (try to) prevent HN from plummeting to its death down it, it's not like this is a hard call.
    - hungerstrike 9y ago
      Without his comment we wouldn’t have had this whole conversation. HN is sliding backwards due to this kind of censorship, not for lack of it.
      - dang 9y ago
        This is not a good conversation to be having; it's a necessary one, made necessary by people breaking this site's rules and endangering it. You're talking to someone who has been doing this same thing for so many years that I basically do it in my sleep, with about as much interest. If that's a backward slide, then (as Voltaire said when someone told him coffee was a slow poison) it must be very slow.
        hungerstrike 9y ago
        > This is not a good conversation to be having. In your (sleepy and uninterested) opinion. I love it. We're all learning so much! There are more comments on this sub-thread than the rest of the thread. > I basically do it in my sleep, with about as much interest... That's exactly what it feels like. Congrats.
        dang 9y ago
        > sleepy and uninterested That of course was a joke, meant to acknowledge how tedious and off-topic these digressions are. A factual version of the remark would be something like 'I've done this tens of thousands of times over several years now, so any negative effect of the sort you're claiming would long have been priced into the system'.
  - deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
kevmo 9y ago
He is suggesting that you not make 1-sentence comments that basically just call someone a sociopath. There's no real analysis there. Everyone who bothers to read your top comment basically just got their time wasted. So what the mods are protecting against is HN becoming full of these time-wasting comments, i.e. they don't want to turn HN into 9gag.

dang 9y ago

The "sociopath" standby, with extra anti-points for "dumb fucks" icing. The thread of course has plenty of things to talk about other than that petrified nugget, which was getting old ten years ago.

20170319 9y ago
"dumb fucks" was an event in time. Sociopath is a quality that manifests repeatedly through different events over time, including this latest one. This entire thread is people saying the same thing in different words. Harvey Weinsten appearing in nothing but his boxer shorts for an actress audition was a moment in time. The qualities that made him creepy and predatory remained constant.
- dang 9y ago
  You're doubling down on what I asked you not to do, which is casually sling accusations of mental illness with an internet swear word. If you do it again we will ban you. Even if you were right in this case (which you have no evidence for, just a connect-the-dots cartoon, and few dots at that), this would still be so. "Sociopath" comes even before "shill" on the feces-throwing internet trigger list. Every time we tolerate such a violation of the site guidelines encourages others to do the same. That slope is both slippery and steep. Since my #1 job is to (try to) prevent HN from plummeting to its death down it, it's not like this is a hard call.
  - hungerstrike 9y ago
    Without his comment we wouldn’t have had this whole conversation. HN is sliding backwards due to this kind of censorship, not for lack of it.
    - dang 9y ago
      This is not a good conversation to be having; it's a necessary one, made necessary by people breaking this site's rules and endangering it. You're talking to someone who has been doing this same thing for so many years that I basically do it in my sleep, with about as much interest. If that's a backward slide, then (as Voltaire said when someone told him coffee was a slow poison) it must be very slow.
      - hungerstrike 9y ago
        > This is not a good conversation to be having. In your (sleepy and uninterested) opinion. I love it. We're all learning so much! There are more comments on this sub-thread than the rest of the thread. > I basically do it in my sleep, with about as much interest... That's exactly what it feels like. Congrats.
        dang 9y ago
        > sleepy and uninterested That of course was a joke, meant to acknowledge how tedious and off-topic these digressions are. A factual version of the remark would be something like 'I've done this tens of thousands of times over several years now, so any negative effect of the sort you're claiming would long have been priced into the system'.
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]

kevmo 9y ago

He is suggesting that you not make 1-sentence comments that basically just call someone a sociopath. There's no real analysis there. Everyone who bothers to read your top comment basically just got their time wasted. So what the mods are protecting against is HN becoming full of these time-wasting comments, i.e. they don't want to turn HN into 9gag.