2 ms·
Money doesn't decide elections, voters do. The campaign that spends more money doesn't always win. In fact there's good reason to think that most money spent on
by cdoxsey 9y ago
Money doesn't decide elections, voters do. The campaign that spends more money doesn't always win. In fact there's good reason to think that most money spent on a campaign is largely wasted:
> The most exciting and visible part of politics is the political campaign. Politicians
and their team of strategists, pollsters, and surrogates wage battle for the votes of
the public. Slogans are trumpeted. Gaffes are made. Tactics are deployed.
> And it probably does not matter all that much.
> At least not as much as the political environment matters. Presidential
elections can be forecast with incredible accuracy well before the campaign really
begins. In fact, if all you know is the state of the economy, you know pretty well
how the incumbent party will do.
http://faculty.georgetown.edu/hcn4/Downloads/Noel_Forum.PDF http://faculty.georgetown.edu/hcn4/Downloads/Noel_Forum.PDF
- Ygg2 9y agoMoney buys ads and people to dig up dirt on opposing side. So in a way, it does buy elections.
- RickJWagner 9y agoIndeed. The last U.S. presidential election showcases this idea. Trump spent less in the primaries than his opponents, and he spent less than Clinton in the election. Money is a factor, but not the sole deciding factor.