3 ms·
The thing I don't understand about allegations like this is that, if true, why in the world did the US not take up Kaspersky on its offer of complete source acc
by indubitable 9y ago
The thing I don't understand about allegations like this is that, if true, why in the world did the US not take up Kaspersky on its offer of complete source access?
Scans are executed client side using client side heuristics. And so what is or is not sent back would be contained within the client. It could be trivially verified that the source code they proffered compiles to the product at the time. And so it would also contain clear evidence whether or not the company's product was collecting and reporting data on software/documents/etc outside the nominal domain of its purpose.
- tptacek 9y agoYou need more than the source; you need the selector/signature configuration at all times the program was running, and the total state of every update ever applied to every running instance of the software. The US already has Kaspersky's source.