It has been argued (http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0905/0905.4641v1.pdf http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0905/0905.4641v1.pdf) that this theorem is flaw

It has been argued (http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0905/0905.4641v1.pdf http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0905/0905.4641v1.pdf) that this theorem is flawed (the premises don't match reality). After briefly studying the matter, I agree, and suspect the flaw is that Conway and Kochen assume that, because the two experiments are separated by a great distance, they may be treated as separate random trials. I believe you can see from the multiple universe interpretation of QM that this assumption is incorrect. I'm not a physicist and have only spent a few hours on it, so take this comment with a big grain of salt. I'm curious to hear if there's a consensus among physicists on the resolution.