4 ms·
"Yet" is key. You can't say the RPi is the most open platform if it's predicated on some future condition. That said, I shouldn't be so critical. The state of
by milcron 9y ago
"Yet" is key. You can't say the RPi is the most open platform if it's predicated on some future condition.
That said, I shouldn't be so critical. The state of free graphics drivers on ARM SBCs is pretty abysmal and any improvement is a good thing. Mostly I object to the assertion "RPi is a free and open platform," but rereading your original post you didn't actually say that. Perhaps we should say "RPi is one of the least-closed platforms." It will be great to see the FOSS VC4 drivers mainlined into the Linux kernel.
Survey of FOSS ARM graphics drivers https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQ3MTM https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTQ3MTM
Hardware that can run the Lima free graphics driver: https://limadriver.org/Hardware/ https://limadriver.org/Hardware/
Hardware that can use the Etnaviv free graphics driver: https://github.com/etnaviv/etna_viv#socs-with-vivante-gpu https://github.com/etnaviv/etna_viv#socs-with-vivante-gpu
- ZenoArrow 9y ago> "Perhaps we should say "RPi is one of the least-closed platforms." " I said "most open". You said "least closed". In my opinion that's the same thing, just with a different spin.