3 ms·
> (Not linking directly because I am not sure if that page is legal, Taylor & Francis Online charges for access). Obviously you don’t owe anyone an explanation
by sammoorhouse 9y ago
> (Not linking directly because I am not sure if that page is legal, Taylor & Francis Online charges for access).
Obviously you don’t owe anyone an explanation, but do you mind discussing your objective here? Is it to make it harder for someone to find the study? Or you don’t want to promote the page by linking to it? Are you worried you’d be breaking the law by adding a direct link? What are your thoughts on the legal vs moral impact of the study being publicly available?
I don’t have an agenda, it’s just clear you’ve put some thought into the whole thing. Cheers.
- cygned 9y agoThanks for asking! The thread's article links to NCBI which links to Taylor & Francis providing the paper. They charge for access to it, though. As I was interested in reading it, I searched for it on Google and found it on the aforementioned ReasearchGate site, accessible for free. As I was not sure if free access to it is legal but I also wanted to enable others to find it, I named the name of the page allowing everyone with the paper's name to find it, without getting into trouble because of linking to it directly.