3 ms·
Ah ha! But not everything is "matter". There exist volume-less particles which do not fit a universal definition of matter. So indeed, there is nothing for whi
by 24gttghh 9y ago
Ah ha! But not everything is "matter". There exist volume-less particles which do not fit a universal definition of matter.
So indeed, there is nothing for which everything is X.
This is a discussion on high school debate, so please take this comment in that light (with a grain of matter).