4 ms·
Uhm, no. If you read that post you'd see that I was mainly interested in the per-key overhead. I'd seen it spoken of as being in the 100 bytes/key range but n
by jzawodn 16y ago
Uhm, no. If you read that post you'd see that I was mainly interested in the per-key overhead. I'd seen it spoken of as being in the 100 bytes/key range but never saw confirmation of that. So I did some back of the envelope calculations and then decided to try it for real.