3 ms·
It has the same <link rel="canonical"> meta tag, though, which points to the non-amp version of the url. Perhaps HN should look for that header and use that fo
by harshreality 9y ago
It has the same <link rel="canonical"> meta tag, though, which points to the non-amp version of the url. Perhaps HN should look for that header and use that for the link.
- JoshMnem 9y agoGood idea. AMP links take seconds to load on my laptop. All I see is a blank page with no indication of loading.
- dEnigma 9y agoI think this might be a problem with your adblocker; at least it was on my PC. After I disabled uBlock, the amp site loaded in no time
- k__ 9y agoAMP pages are simply too buggy. I don't understand this because they want to replace the slow bug ridden JS pages...
- dEnigma 9y agoIndeed, lately I have seen more slow AMPs (the acronym already contains the word "page" btw) than fast ones. Multiple issues, including the one the grandparent is pointing out, make AMP look and feel like a step back.
- JoshMnem 9y agoI think that it's not a good idea to browse the Web without protection. I'll strip the /amp from the URL before I disable an extension.