3 ms·
Really hope purism finds success with this. An open phone platform has been a long time coming, I hope they can learning from the missteps of ubuntu and firefox
by c0smic 9y ago
Really hope purism finds success with this. An open phone platform has been a long time coming, I hope they can learning from the missteps of ubuntu and firefox.
I like the idea of managing my phone like I manage my computer; install whatever OS and software I want on it. Of course, that comes with the additional effort of keeping it well updated and working, and if this is a primary communication device that effort becomes more urgent. But hey, I think that's just what it takes to not be dependent on a corporation that takes my data/info in exchange for device support.
- yjftsjthsd-h 9y ago> Of course, that comes with the additional effort of keeping it well updated Yeah, but you actually get the option, and you, the owner of the device, have the power to make it happen.
- gehsty 9y agoCrowd funded, then crowd sourced security updates? Really? I think it is a noble effort with zero chance of success, its like Linux on the desktop, but with the further complication of expecting people to pay $$$ for out of date hardware, with what will no doubt be terrible software, with no apps users actually want to use....
- bostand 9y agoDefine success. Btw, Linux on desktop is used by many large tech companies...
- gehsty 9y agoUsed by a significant portion of computer users, ie Windows Phone is not a successful platform, Android is, and if Microsoft can't make a successful phone platform, what chance does this go fund me campaign have. 'Many large tech companies' is pretty insignificant when you look at the number of people who use desktop computers, and then even more insignificant when you look at the number of people who use phones, and is a very poor metric as it doesn't really consider people actually choosing to purchase the system when others are on offer. There is just no value in their proposition to consumers... Have an expensive old phone, made by a company that can in no way support your purchase should the hardware fail... And I don't believe for a second that it will be more secure than iOS or even Android. Small team, custom operating system, the user can install their own OS, sounds like a recipe for disaster.
- bostand 9y agoI don't think your definition of success matches theirs. People have different values, some value openness above market share. --- Speaking of openness, and since you mentioned ios: apple recently unpublished a company's entire catalog of apps without any explanations. The word on the street is malware (well technically fraudulent adware) but do you think you will ever get apple to admit that?
- gehsty 9y agoI think it will match their version of success when they run out of money and are no longer able to support their users. I don't know about the case you mention. I do not think that Apple manage their developer community well, but most issues like the one you highlight are generally edge cases - users doing something that isn't clearly defined by Apple rules. What was the company and what did its apps specifically do? If it was fraudulent adware do you not agree that they should be removed?
- numismatex 9y agoUh, people will happily pay "$$$" for out of date hardware, with terrible software, as a compromise for security and privacy. Especially if you're carrying around sensitive documents or cryptocurrency on your phone.
- annabellish 9y agoThe idea of giving the average user, or even the average power-user, a device which a) doesn't automatically and aggressively update, and b) is full of every single kind of mainstream radio is terrifying. Smartphones live in one of the most dangerous environments around for security - constantly connecting to third party networks on various protocols and technologies and intrinsically in close proximity to attackers - and not auto-updating puts the average user at risk.
- chronial 9y agoMaybe I'm misunderstanding the tone here, but you do realize that you just described the standard situation of smartphones, right? It is clearly a minority of people that have smartphones that still receive security updates. All fancy force-upgrade mechanisms are useless if there are no updates to be installed.
- emilsedgh 9y ago> additional effort of keeping it well updated and working I don't know what you're talking about. Almost every 5 years I get a new laptop, install Debian on it and it gets updated just fine forever. And I customize it to the bone.