3 ms·
> It doesn’t matter. Yeah, I remember this argument. It depends on whether it benefits Apple or not. For example, when Apple moved off of Google for it's map
by jasonlotito 9y ago
> It doesn’t matter.
Yeah, I remember this argument. It depends on whether it benefits Apple or not. For example, when Apple moved off of Google for it's mapping, people were saying that this was just the first iteration, the first version of Maps, when it clearly wasn't, and that the fact that it lost features and information that were there before, people were okay with it because it was Apple's first map software (when it really wasn't).
I just find it interesting the way this argument is used for and against Apple.
- ClassyJacket 9y agoIt's not hard to see why Apple launching one iPhone in America only, a full decade ago, doesn't matter when the next nine iPhones came out everywhere.
- jasonlotito 9y agoSure, but why tell me?
- LeoNatan25 9y agoBecause you are the one making nonsense arguments.
- jasonlotito 9y agoMy argument? I wasn't making an argument about the iPhone, merely commenting on the hypocrisy of those making these claims and how they were used before to bolster Apple. You can't hold both to be true at the same time. Either Apple was wrong with it's Maps release, or Microsoft was fine when not competing. You can't say Apple was right and Microsoft was wrong. It's illogical.
- megy 9y agoAnd other people also said that it has to be as good as google maps now. And it has gotten better. Still not google maps good.
- erikpukinskis 9y agoYou don't need to be better than your competitors on every axis. You need to be good enough on every axis, and better on at least one axis that is a common purchase decider.