4 ms·
I stand corrected, I was going off https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730730(v=ws.11).aspx https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730730(v=ws.
by Crosseye_Jack 9y ago
I stand corrected, I was going off https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730730(v=ws.11).aspx https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc730730(v=ws.11... which doesn't state that /p is implied unless /q is given. But yeah that lifewire link gave the KB number to the change of behaviour notice https://support.microsoft.com/help/941961/ https://support.microsoft.com/help/941961/
- jaclaz 9y agoYep, no prob, I also posted a link to that kb above (but maybe it was posted after your post and went above your reply because it was a direct reply to roywiggins' post). Anyway, I wanted to also highlight how since the company where he worked was specifically a "software company" (I mean not a mom and pop shop around the corner or similar) the IT guys over there should have wiped the disk anyway, possibly using the SecureErase ATA command (that wipes also not normally accessible disk areas), it should be "standard" procedure.