It seems pretty clear you skimmed my post without reading it (since I bookended it start and finish with the central assertion that the data you presented is co

It seems pretty clear you skimmed my post without reading it (since I bookended it start and finish with the central assertion that the data you presented is consistent with the use case I described.) If you want to edit your comment to take it in a more fruitful direction, no one will hold it against you. You're not the first person to skim a long post.