3 ms·
In your first argument, you argued that we could not colonize Mars. Now you concede that we can colonize Mars, while arguing humans have a fundamental flaw. Wha
by crush-n-spread 9y ago
In your first argument, you argued that we could not colonize Mars. Now you concede that we can colonize Mars, while arguing humans have a fundamental flaw. What is your point, and why do you hold it?
- QAPereo 9y agoI conceded what now? What I did is something called “arguing in the alternative,” and that only by the narrowest of margins.