The next revolution needs to be in reproducing what has been "peer reviewed". During my time at a genetics company I learned bad science abounds even in the " t

The next revolution needs to be in reproducing what has been "peer reviewed". During my time at a genetics company I learned bad science abounds even in the " top" journals. One particular example is people "collabing" just to get their name on more papers, which they turn around and use as a marketing tool. Any time I hear the phrase "I've been published $number of times" these days I tend to think they are worse scientist's not better.