3 ms·
Thank you for the feedback. > So, I would suggest that you don't call this an alternative to find; it's not. A replacement for shell globs, sure. A replacement
by sharkdp 9y ago
Thank you for the feedback.
> So, I would suggest that you don't call this an alternative to find; it's not. A replacement for shell globs, sure. A replacement for poor file finding in text editors, OK. Just... not find.
It's literally called "a simple [..] alternative to find" and the very first sentence in the README says that "it does not seek to mirror all of find's powerful functionality". I'm not sure anymore how far I have to back off until everyone will be okay with my "advertising" :-)
- tangus 9y agoBut in fact it does not seek to mirror _any_ of find's powerful functionality. Maybe advertize it as "a better ls -R | grep -i"?