FWIW, imo, wisdom is not a superadditive function of sets of opinions, nor will asking a group of people their opinions and averaging it constitute wisdom (but

FWIW, imo, wisdom is not a superadditive function of sets of opinions, nor will asking a group of people their opinions and averaging it constitute wisdom (but rather, the exact opposite - de facto, the least time-tested opinion possible), but the attempt to introduce more people to philosophy is worth commending. Also, try to make the questions as defined as possible ("people" = individuals/bodies/ancestors/nationalities/citizenry? "same & equal" = equal in measures of 'potential'/so-called 'purity'/granted and guaranteed rights/talents and skills/past accomplishments/future ambitions/dreams and hopes/preferences and desires/moral systems and reputation/underlying hardware/historylessness/memorylessness/tabula rasa/free will/popularity?); maybe also make the question a binary one with only a true/false answer, because there are other ways to nitpick the current answers as being non-mutually-exclusive (i.e. does different imply non-equal at both a mathematical but also a social level?)