3 ms·
I don't know that, but if it wasn't breaking at all then why would they be upgrading solution than never failed? Apollo 13 whole computer system had less power
by joering2 9y ago
I don't know that, but if it wasn't breaking at all then why would they be upgrading solution than never failed?
Apollo 13 whole computer system had less power than the phone in your pocket; yet that was perfectly enough to run the vehicle. Crazy times...
- sasoon 9y agoI would say your phone in your pocket is probably 100,000 times more powerfull than computer in Apollo 13.
- flashmob 9y agoAgreed. Although in this case it would seem like it was increase on the astronaut's workload, having to load each program from tape. Also the article mentioned that they were using outdated software development methods and tools, whatever they were it didn't mention. Btw, found my answer after some googling, they were upgraded in the early 90's then again in early 2000's http://www.aviationtoday.com/1999/11/01/the-space-shuttle-modernized/ http://www.aviationtoday.com/1999/11/01/the-space-shuttle-mo... quote "In addition to 11 MDUs in the shuttle, MEDS has four integrated display processors (IDPs) that contain 386DX computers and a 300-megabyte hard disc." MDU - multiple display unit.
- pinewurst 9y agoIt's interesting that (from the very interesting cited article) the processor in each MDU, an R3000, is more powerful than all the legacy IBM 4Pis serving as Shuttle main computers.
- rockinghigh 9y agoApollo: 2.048 MHz iPhone 6: 2.34 GHz