3 ms·
Misparse, I think. Both "was"es refer to the state of using 7 being defensible. Maybe a better phrasing: Using 7 would have remained defensible as long as it ha
by saulrh 9y ago
Misparse, I think. Both "was"es refer to the state of using 7 being defensible. Maybe a better phrasing: Using 7 would have remained defensible as long as it had security support, but now even that's insufficient. Alternatively, the parent argues that 7 is de facto unsupported now no matter what Microsoft claims.
- amazingman 9y agoThis is a great breakdown. Are you using any specific cognitive techniques or patterns/habits that help you do this?
- SolarNet 9y agoI suspect reading... and Poe's law.
- DamonHD 9y agoLess crunchy than Cole's Law.
- amazingman 9y agoThat’s some delicious snark and all, but if it were only that simple. In general, most people tend to be oblivious to—perhaps even motivated to miss—when the source of a disagreement might be linguistic confusion rather than actual disagreement.