4 ms·
I think it might just be a strangely formed sentence where the part "if it contains the item" is not the subject of the report, but a condition: If it contains
by kata 9y ago
I think it might just be a strangely formed sentence where the part "if it contains the item" is not the subject of the report, but a condition:
If it contains the item -> reports that it contains the item (correctly)
If it doesn't contain the item -> may report that it contains the item (incorrectly)
- kakarot 9y agoNothing wrong with being pedantic when dealing with definitions.
- egocentric 9y agoSince we're on the topic of being pedantic, "well, you know, that's just, like... your opinion, man". I'd argue that there's nothing excessive about arguing if A may, in fact, be the opposite of A :)
- kakarot 9y agoCertainly not, I'm all for some arguing on the internet.
- magicalhippo 9y agoThe logic you wrote is exactly the _opposite_ of what a Bloom filter does.