2 ms·
Sorry, I was not saying that the article applied Chebyshev's inequality. It's not related at all. But it's an example of a result where you do not have to assum
by tgb 9y ago
Sorry, I was not saying that the article applied Chebyshev's inequality. It's not related at all. But it's an example of a result where you do not have to assume that your distribution is a member of a particular family of distributions. The result being applied here is really really general: it says that 95% of the probability mass occurs before the point at which 95% of the probability mass has occurred by. This is tautological. Like saying that 50% of people are below the median - it's true without making any assumptions about people (except that there are finite numbers of them).