3 ms·
This seems to have started around 1976/1977. Polaroid wasn't exactly a tiny startup then, so they had the financial resources to defend themselves. https://boo
by johansch 9y ago
This seems to have started around 1976/1977. Polaroid wasn't exactly a tiny startup then, so they had the financial resources to defend themselves.
https://books.google.com/books?id=6TTbCT64seEC&pg=PA91&lpg=PA91 https://books.google.com/books?id=6TTbCT64seEC&pg=PA91&lpg=P...
"In 1977, (Polaroid) revenues reached $1 billion"
The lawsuit took 15 years to settle:
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/16/business/kodak-settles-with-polaroid.html http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/16/business/kodak-settles-wit...
- johansch 9y ago> The lawsuit took 15 years to settle Which doesn't contradict that thing about Kodak initially having to remove their products from the market within 30 days, of course. My main beef was that Animat's comment seemed to say (or at least imply) that back then, patents protected smaller companies against larger bullies - which seems off since Polaroid was a billion dollar business at the time. I'm sure Kodak was larger (update: I just found a figure of $5.9B revenue for 1977), but still. A yearly revenue of a billion dollars does mean you are able to defend yourself, even if it gets prolonged - as evidenced by the case dragging out for 15 years...