4 ms·
The article presents only one side of the story. I have never heard of Google being accused of something similar in the past. Does anyone have any pointers to
by noncoml 9y ago
The article presents only one side of the story.
I have never heard of Google being accused of something similar in the past. Does anyone have any pointers to similar incidents?
- kuschku 9y agoIt also presents Google’s answer, which was > that Attia gave Google rights to his technology “without a condition of later payment.” They admit they did it, but claim they were in the right to do it.
- ithkuil 9y agoCould that mean that the condition was immediate payment? (Salary,bonus, stock, ...)
- kuschku 9y agoOr it could have been that he only gets paid if that very specific project would make profit, etc. There’s many way to write such a contract.
- bagacrap 9y agoSo it devotes one article to one side, and six words (a quote of a quote) to the other side. That doesn't seem very even handed. News outlets profit when people get outraged; why would you trust this one to be disinterested?