5 ms·
I'm a physics major, and still in science 20 years later, cancer research. I originally came here to ask, in general, why would anyone care about this result?
by killjoywashere 9y ago
I'm a physics major, and still in science 20 years later, cancer research. I originally came here to ask, in general, why would anyone care about this result?
Since you asserted an answer to the question before I managed to ask, I'm happy to subordinate my question. But I will also suggest your specific answer, cure cancer, won't work. I need to kill cells, which requires a cascade of large molecules interacting at energies on the order of a fraction of an eV, or massive amounts of high energy radiation.
I can kill cells directly with high energy radiation, however, the energies for this investigation, the hydrogen 2s-4p transition, (1,2) are trivial (486 nm is visible light). Also, radiotherapy isn't really good at interrogating cell type, the current standard for new cancer therapies (immunotherapy).
(1) http://science.sciencemag.org/content/358/6359/79 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/358/6359/79
(2) https://indico.mitp.uni-mainz.de/event/14/contribution/11/material/slides/0.pdf https://indico.mitp.uni-mainz.de/event/14/contribution/11/ma...
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y agoI don't think the parent comment meant that literally. Sometimes we don't know what new knowledge will enable us to do until the PhDs, engineers, and technicians get their hands on it.
- miemo 9y agoIt's like finding out your friend since childhood is 3 years older than you always thought. People care because it's jarring that something so 'known' and basic might be different. And yeah the cancer part was more a 'holy grail' thing. replace it with 'cures poverty' and his point still stands