4 ms·
"but little or no scientific work to be done." Quite a lot has been written about what scientific work needs to be done. These papers try to summarize possible
by apsec112 9y ago
"but little or no scientific work to be done."
Quite a lot has been written about what scientific work needs to be done. These papers try to summarize possible research directions:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06565.pdf https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06565.pdf
https://intelligence.org/files/TechnicalAgenda.pdf https://intelligence.org/files/TechnicalAgenda.pdf
- markan 9y agoYes and no. For safety of narrow AI systems, yeah, there's a lot of scope for research, and that's what your first link gets at. But for AGI (which is what Tegmark talks about), there's no good way to get a handle on safety yet (other than working towards figuring out AGI). As for MIRI's agenda, I don't buy that it will help with AGI safety at all. There are a variety of reasons for that, some of which are discussed in the piece I linked above.