3 ms·
But there are flavors of free speech. I, for one, don't believe that violent threats fall under free speech. I don't believe that makes me against free speech.
by s73ver_ 9y ago
But there are flavors of free speech. I, for one, don't believe that violent threats fall under free speech. I don't believe that makes me against free speech.
- shkkmo 9y agoViolent threats are already illegal and I haven't seen anyone here arguing to make them legal. What is your point?
- s73ver_ 9y agoI see plenty of people saying that all speech should be legal, and that sites like Twitter shouldn't police any speech. That would include violent threats.
- shkkmo 9y ago> I see plenty of people saying that all speech should be legal So why don't you go argue with them on a platform where they exist? I haven't see anyone making that claim here or in the article. Again, what is you point? > sites like Twitter shouldn't police any speech. That would include violent threats Generally we leave enforcement of the laws to law enforcement officials. Twitter should give out the information needed to prosecute that illegal speech and send those people to jail, not be in the business of determining what speech is illegal in a way where all of the protections of our legal system are lost.