3 ms·
Right. You just need to redefine what "freedom of speech" or "freedom of press" means. For example, "freedom of press" doesn't cover publishing whats defined a
by 21 9y ago
Right. You just need to redefine what "freedom of speech" or "freedom of press" means.
For example, "freedom of press" doesn't cover publishing whats defined as "information of non-public interest" (see Gawker). I'm not defending or accusing Gawker, just providing an example that "freedom of press" comes with a lot of exceptions and new ones are continuously added.
- seorphates 9y agoSure. But given recent events and the increasingly blatant escalation of government power over its people it starts to become more clear that, at the root of it, "freedom of speech and of the press" means exactly that which our current governments fear the most and desperately aim to control - the freedom for all to research, dig and question the authority that governs them. It has almost become a simple interpretation. Which brings us to the second. Complicate that with the fact that through generous corporate sponsorship we now seem to find our collective selves being led by all manner of wolves.