3 ms·

Fair enough, but remember to put a “per capita” section in the scale.

• dredmorbius 9y ago
  It's ... more complicated than that. I've just recently run across a reference to a metric for military force and capability, though I can't recall at the moment what it is based on. Though I believe it related to the capacity to project force. The size of an army, its relation to the total population size, the distance / range at which it can act, the quantity, accuracy, and efficacy of force project, and much else. Just by way of example, I've been looking at WWII history, particularly the fall of France. On base specifications, French armour was actually more capable than German, with one critical exception: German tanks had radios. The ability to act in concert and respond in realtime to changing battle circumstances proved critical. Against a relatively numerically-balanced French force, the German military was tremendously more effective. Blitzkreig tactics didn't work against numerically-superiour, and largely technically-matched, US and British forces on and after D-Day, though. Quantifying fitness metrics is complicated.