4 ms·
"For big backups, storage is (slightly less than) twice as expensive as S3, but unlike S3, there are no bandwidth costs." Just to clarify ... we (rsync.net) su
by rsync 9y ago
"For big backups, storage is (slightly less than) twice as expensive as S3, but unlike S3, there are no bandwidth costs."
Just to clarify ... we (rsync.net) support "borg backup" now (with borg deployed on the server side ...) which is the "holy grail" of efficient, zero knowledge, remote backups:
https://www.stavros.io/posts/holy-grail-backups/ https://www.stavros.io/posts/holy-grail-backups/
... and if you are willing to give up our ZFS snapshots on the account (you manage retention yourself with borg) and you are willing to handle your own technical support of borg, we offer a 3 cents rate. This is about the same price as S3:
http://rsync.net/products/attic.html http://rsync.net/products/attic.html
- corobo 9y agoSorry guys the path of least resistance also took into account price. I'll admit I've not checked your pricing recently but last time I used your service I was paying something like $70/yr for <100G storage