2 ms·
The trouble with these code snippets is that they condense very complex and squishy social structures into what incorrectly appears to be simple binary decision
by nobodyorother 9y ago
The trouble with these code snippets is that they condense very complex and squishy social structures into what incorrectly appears to be simple binary decisions. Creative Commons spent years defining what "commercial" means.
It's obviously a commercial use if I'm using your items to make money... But, what if I'm a charity? What if it's hosted on a website that runs banner ads? What if I don't turn a profit? This was a years-long discussion that you can review https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/NonCommercial https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/NonCommercial
Code emphasizes what consensus we need to come to, the consensus that those complex legal documents define. For example, that's part of why the GPL is so long, it's specific.
- kemitchell 9y agoL0-NC uses CC's language defining "commercial".
- TheCoelacanth 9y agoAlso, how do you define "contributing"? Is one commit enough to get perpetual use? Do I need one commit a year/month? I can't think of a single definition that wouldn't either allow users who aren't making a significant contribution to cheat or screw over some legitimate contributors.