>typical pattern of maintainer burnout [...] , since a successful open source project Right, but that's what my "game theory thought experiment" was trying to

>typical pattern of maintainer burnout [...] , since a successful open source project Right, but that's what my "game theory thought experiment" was trying to dissect: the 90-day restriction can dissuade commercial entities from embracing that software so therefore, it's not "successful". As a result, there is no work overload and no burnout. Which past open-source project can we confidently replay history with the L0 license and say it would have roughly the same commercial adoption and the maintainers got paid more money?