4 ms·
Setting aside the practical detail that not everything is node.js: Nobody would want to sell commercial software under the terms of "you have to license our sof
by rspeer 9y ago
Setting aside the practical detail that not everything is node.js: Nobody would want to sell commercial software under the terms of "you have to license our software A, but it won't work unless you also license software B from someone else at the same time".
- lazerwalker 9y agoPresumably that's where having a single place to handle payments comes in handy. It's (hopefully?) less "well, you have to go to this other person and license their software too" as much as "here's the total cost for a license (which happens to include both A and B)"
- zokier 9y agoThere is already plenty of commercial software that depends on other commercial middleware that needs to be licensed separately. Of course licensing each and every library is typically bit different in scale, but conceptually it is pretty much the same thing.
- mperham 9y agoSure, no one's ever bought Tableau along with a Windows Server license to solve their data warehouse analytics needs.
- rspeer 9y agoYou're not describing a strict dependency. You can just buy Tableau and use it.