3 ms·
Definitely seems excessive. We'll look into it. There are some things that can affect it. We have a "pool" of restore servers that do this task. The oldest
by brianwski 9y ago
Definitely seems excessive. We'll look into it.
There are some things that can affect it. We have a "pool" of restore servers that do this task. The oldest ones in the pool are 9 year old computers with slow hard drives. The newest restore servers are built on SSDs and are blazingly fast and have newer processors. So based on which restore server was assigned the task, plus other things like the size of each file can speed or slow the restore.
We are in the middle of a project to speed up all restores. Hilariously we figured out that simply by decommissioning the oldest, saddest restore servers the restores averaged FASTER restore times.
- BillinghamJ 9y agoPresumably you mean faster than the non-hardware solution you were working on?