4 ms·
Second on the linux client. I have a linux machine with a zfs volume that I've been backing up to crashplan. Since they've announced they're dumping their consu
by jstrassburg 9y ago
Second on the linux client. I have a linux machine with a zfs volume that I've been backing up to crashplan. Since they've announced they're dumping their consumer market I have no cost-effective place to go. Most likely, I'll be more picky about my backups and use S3 life-cycled to Glacier.
- comboy 9y ago> Since they've announced they're dumping their consumer market Could you link some source? I'm also backing up my linux machines with them and would prefer to plan ahead.
- BillinghamJ 9y agoThey have emailed a few times about it. Some info here: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/23/crashplan_ends_consumer_plans/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/08/23/crashplan_ends_cons...
- pnutjam 9y agotime4vps.eu has some nicely price storage servers. They have no backup, since they're designed to be part of a larger backup strategy, but it works for me. affiliate link: https://billing.time4vps.eu/?affid=1881 https://billing.time4vps.eu/?affid=1881 Cheaper then backblaze in most situations and you get a full linux host.
- jlgaddis 9y agoI would really like to use rsync.net for my "external third-party" backups specifically because of their "ZFS Platform" [0] but (from my off the top of my head calculations) their pricing seems to come out a little on the high side. With my luck, the first time I need to be able to quickly restore a full dataset or something, it will probably have been well worth it and I'll likely be kicking myself for not doing it. [0]: http://www.rsync.net/products/platform.html#zfs http://www.rsync.net/products/platform.html#zfs
- metalliqaz 9y agoBe careful with rsync.net if you're on a comcast cable modem. They can't seem to handle the "xfinity powerboost" and you end up being throttled to 160kB/sec